Equatorial Guinea vs Viet Nam: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Equatorial Guinea
105,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
112,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
69th
Viet Nam rank
67th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Viet Nam
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k199420082023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 112,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 105,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 69th and Viet Nam ranks 67th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 41,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2010s 93,249 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,349 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 99,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 105,845 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Equatorial Guinea or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 112,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 105,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam?
6,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Viet Nam rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 69th and Viet Nam ranks 67th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Viet Nam: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/viet-nam/">Equatorial Guinea vs Viet Nam: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.