Cyprus vs Least developed countries: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Cyprus
550,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
6,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
34th
Least developed countries rank
31st

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Least developed countries
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197519992023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 550,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 544,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 89.6 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 166 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 339,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,796 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 335,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 382,587 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 377,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 514,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,934 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 508,576 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Cyprus or Least developed countries?
Cyprus, at 550,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Cyprus and Least developed countries?
544,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Least developed countries?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Least developed countries rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Cyprus ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Least developed countries: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Cyprus vs Least developed countries: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.