Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Burkina Faso
12,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
136th
Kazakhstan rank
138th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Kazakhstan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196519942023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 12,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 136th and Kazakhstan ranks 138th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 2,204 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,297 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,093 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 3,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,109 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 543.84 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 7,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,310 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 277.88 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 11,306 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Burkina Faso or Kazakhstan?
Burkina Faso, at 12,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,154 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Burkina Faso ranks 136th and Kazakhstan ranks 138th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/kazakhstan/">Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.