Botswana vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Botswana
10,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
9,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Botswana rank
140th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
142nd

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 10,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 140th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 142nd of 166 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 5,075 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 7,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,808 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 693.46 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Botswana or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Botswana, at 10,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
How do Botswana and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Botswana ranks 140th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 142nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/lao-pdr/">Botswana vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.