Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
78,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
82,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
79th
Guatemala rank
77th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Guatemala
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 82,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Guatemala ranks 77th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 61,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 70,035 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,026 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,009 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 76,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76,713 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 149.1 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 82,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
3,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Guatemala ranks 77th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guatemala/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.