Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Belarus
40,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
39,776 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
107th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
108th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0k40.0k60.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 40,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,776 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Belarus ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 108th of 166 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 43,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,061 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,282 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 42,340 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,643 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,303 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 40,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Belarus, at 40,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,776 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 108th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,054 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.