Côte d'Ivoire vs Egypt: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment
Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 27.94 % against 15.9 % in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 12.04 %.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.8 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment, Côte d'Ivoire or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 27.94 % against 15.9 % in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment between Côte d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 12.04 %, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Egypt?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Egypt rank globally for gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.