Brazil vs North Macedonia: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment

Brazil
-9.95 %
in 2025
North Macedonia
-8.64 %
in 2025
Brazil rank
57th
North Macedonia rank
55th

Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment over time

  • Brazil
  • North Macedonia
-10-8-6-4200220132025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports -8.64 % against -9.95 % in Brazil, a difference of 1.31 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 57th and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 68 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s -3.85 % -6.24 % 2.39 % Brazil
2010s -9.25 % -6.56 % 2.69 % North Macedonia
2020s -9.52 % -7.2 % 2.32 % North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment, Brazil or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at -8.64 % against -9.95 % in Brazil as of 2025.
What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment between Brazil and North Macedonia?
1.31 %, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and North Macedonia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Brazil and North Macedonia rank globally for gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment?
Brazil ranks 57th and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 68 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs North Macedonia: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-share-of-employees-in-industry-total-employment-value-all-age-ranges-or/brazil/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-share-of-employees-in-industry-total-employment-value-all-age-ranges-or/brazil/north-macedonia/">Brazil vs North Macedonia: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
77 places, 1,154 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.