Armenia vs Viet Nam: Gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — Value — All age
Gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — Value — All age over time
- Armenia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.21 % against 0.11 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.1 %.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.9 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2 % | 0.08 % | 0.12 % | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.1757 % | 0.0543 % | 0.1214 % | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — value — all age, Armenia or Viet Nam?
- Armenia, at 0.21 % against 0.11 % in Viet Nam as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — value — all age between Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 0.1 %, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Armenia and Viet Nam rank globally for gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — value — all age?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in earnings of employees in rural areas — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.