OECD members vs Turkmenistan: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- OECD members
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 4.6% against 1.4% in OECD members, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 3.3 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
OECD members ranks 38th and Turkmenistan ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD members | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.3% | 0.4% | 2.9% | OECD members |
| 1990s | 1.8% | -0.9% | 2.7% | OECD members |
| 2000s | 1.1% | 5.4% | 4.3% | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 6.3% | 4.8% | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 4.2% | 2.9% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, OECD members or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 4.6% against 1.4% in OECD members as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between OECD members and Turkmenistan?
- 3.2%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Turkmenistan?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do OECD members and Turkmenistan rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- OECD members ranks 38th and Turkmenistan ranks 38th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.