Cuba vs Zimbabwe: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 4,617 constant LCU against 4,381 constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 236 constant LCU.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Cuba ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 202nd of 213 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1,991 constant LCU | 4,630 constant LCU | 2,639 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 3,030 constant LCU | 4,538 constant LCU | 1,508 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 2,376 constant LCU | 4,862 constant LCU | 2,486 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3,249 constant LCU | 3,533 constant LCU | 284.41 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 4,698 constant LCU | 3,896 constant LCU | 801.11 constant LCU | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4,628 constant LCU | 3,933 constant LCU | 695.07 constant LCU | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at 4,617 constant LCU against 4,381 constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 236 constant LCU, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Cuba ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 202nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.