Estonia vs Slovakia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Estonia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 20,282 constant 2015 US$ against 19,966 constant 2015 US$ in Slovakia, a difference of 316 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 59th and Slovakia ranks 60th of 212 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,023 constant 2015 US$ | 7,957 constant 2015 US$ | 66.11 constant 2015 US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 13,736 constant 2015 US$ | 11,464 constant 2015 US$ | 2,272 constant 2015 US$ | Estonia |
| 2010s | 17,691 constant 2015 US$ | 16,210 constant 2015 US$ | 1,481 constant 2015 US$ | Estonia |
| 2020s | 20,505 constant 2015 US$ | 19,111 constant 2015 US$ | 1,394 constant 2015 US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Estonia or Slovakia?
- Estonia, at 20,282 constant 2015 US$ against 19,966 constant 2015 US$ in Slovakia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Estonia and Slovakia?
- 316 constant 2015 US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Slovakia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Slovakia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Estonia ranks 59th and Slovakia ranks 60th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.