Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
35th
Equatorial Guinea rank
37th

GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Equatorial Guinea
0200400600800196019922025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 35th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 247.42 current LCU per US$ of GDP 62.71 current LCU per US$ of GDP 184.71 current LCU per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1970s 245.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP 64.99 current LCU per US$ of GDP 180.8 current LCU per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1980s 334.26 current LCU per US$ of GDP 283.63 current LCU per US$ of GDP 50.63 current LCU per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 445.75 current LCU per US$ of GDP 445.75 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current LCU per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 568.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP 570.11 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.29 current LCU per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 537.01 current LCU per US$ of GDP 537.01 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.001 current LCU per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 591.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP 591.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current LCU per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
Central African Republic, at 581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 581.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
0 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gdp (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 35th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 11,760 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.