Myanmar vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Myanmar
119.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
37th
Tanzania rank
34th

GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Myanmar
  • Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 119.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 39.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Myanmar ranks 37th and Tanzania ranks 34th of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 6.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 8.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 19.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 12.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 16.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 34.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 45.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 56.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 107.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre 105.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 119.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 147.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Myanmar or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 119.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Myanmar and Tanzania?
39.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Tanzania rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Myanmar ranks 37th and Tanzania ranks 34th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/tanzania/">Myanmar vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 10,754 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.