Burkina Faso vs Iceland: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
37.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
35.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
60th
Iceland rank
61st

GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Iceland
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 37.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 35.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 1.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 61st of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 3.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 5.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 8.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 15.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 14.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 22.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 25.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 35.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre 32.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Iceland?
Burkina Faso, at 37.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 35.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
1.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 61st of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Iceland: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/">Burkina Faso vs Iceland: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 10,754 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.