South Africa vs Tunisia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

South Africa
299,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
311,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
129th
Tunisia rank
127th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 311,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 299,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 11,590 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 72,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,683 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,264 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 109,358 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,078 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 141,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 93,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 159,814 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 139,395 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 217,633 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217,539 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 94.2 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 281,004 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 291,462 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 291,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 303,540 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,751 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, South Africa or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 311,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 299,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between South Africa and Tunisia?
11,590 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tunisia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/tunisia/">South Africa vs Tunisia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.