Naoero vs Sub-Saharan Africa: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Naoero
4.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
82,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
38th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
37th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Naoero
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 4.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 82,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 4.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 58.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

Naoero ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th of 208 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 14.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero
1980s 11.70 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,486 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.67 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 5.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,718 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,082 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 3.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,655 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.68 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 4.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,885 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.70 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Naoero or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Naoero, at 4.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 82,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa?
4.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Naoero ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Sub-Saharan Africa: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/sub-saharan-africa/">Naoero vs Sub-Saharan Africa: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.