Monaco vs OECD members: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Monaco
4.22 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Monaco rank
1st
OECD members rank
2nd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Monaco
  • OECD members
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 4.22 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 4.22 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Monaco's figure about 2,670.2 times OECD members's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

Monaco ranks 1st and OECD members ranks 2nd of 208 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.06 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 494,683 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.06 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco
1980s 1.36 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 662,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.36 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco
1990s 1.68 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 878,352 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.68 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 2.17 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.17 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 2.91 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.91 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco
2020s 3.71 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.51 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.71 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Monaco or OECD members?
Monaco, at 4.22 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Monaco and OECD members?
4.22 billion constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and OECD members?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Monaco and OECD members rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Monaco ranks 1st and OECD members ranks 2nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs OECD members: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/monaco/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/monaco/oecd-members/">Monaco vs OECD members: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.