Lesotho vs Tanzania: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Lesotho
74,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
79,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
175th
Tanzania rank
174th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 79,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 74,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 5,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Lesotho ranks 175th and Tanzania ranks 174th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 8,883 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,163 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 15,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,307 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 24,740 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 40,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,994 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 54,966 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,487 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 74,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,789 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,713 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 71,919 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,372 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,453 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Lesotho or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 79,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 74,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Lesotho and Tanzania?
5,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Tanzania rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 175th and Tanzania ranks 174th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Tanzania: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tanzania/">Lesotho vs Tanzania: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.