Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
68th
Sri Lanka rank
71st

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sri Lanka
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 190,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 208 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 723,558 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 136,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 587,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 918,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 183,556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 735,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 869,415 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 294,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 574,477 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 459,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 741,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 732,578 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 617,746 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.33 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75,618 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 1.51 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.48 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Sri Lanka?
Jamaica, at 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
190,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Sri Lanka rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/">Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.