Ireland vs Mauritius: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Ireland
7.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
7.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
29th
Mauritius rank
30th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ireland
  • Mauritius
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 7.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 127,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Ireland ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 427,737 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 624,759 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 197,021 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 658,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 923,526 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 264,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 943,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 497,266 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.53 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 996,778 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 2.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 4.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 6.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 318,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Ireland or Mauritius?
Ireland, at 7.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Ireland and Mauritius?
127,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Mauritius rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Ireland ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Mauritius: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/mauritius/">Ireland vs Mauritius: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.