Guatemala vs Mexico: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
683,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
90th
Mexico rank
92nd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mexico
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 683,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 72,819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 93,514 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,041 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 161,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 199,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 207,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 309,576 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 101,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 279,170 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 394,819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 115,649 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 403,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 513,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 110,336 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 567,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 612,847 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 708,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 646,673 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,306 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Mexico?
Guatemala, at 755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 683,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Mexico?
72,819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mexico rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mexico: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/">Guatemala vs Mexico: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.