Finland vs Guatemala: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Finland
830,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
87th
Guatemala rank
90th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 830,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 74,397 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 87th and Guatemala ranks 90th of 208 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 203,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 93,514 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 109,630 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 308,916 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 161,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 147,809 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 430,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 207,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 516,932 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 279,170 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 237,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 722,898 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 403,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 319,346 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 788,649 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 567,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 221,454 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 829,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 708,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 120,847 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Finland or Guatemala?
Finland, at 830,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 755,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Finland and Guatemala?
74,397 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Guatemala rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 87th and Guatemala ranks 90th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Guatemala: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/guatemala/">Finland vs Guatemala: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.