Denmark vs IDA blend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
8.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
278,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
28th
IDA blend rank
26th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IDA blend
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 8.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 278,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 8.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 31.5 times IDA blend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 28th and IDA blend ranks 26th of 208 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 2.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.57 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 3.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,624 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 4.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.47 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 5.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,987 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 6.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.82 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 7.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 219,423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7.38 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 8.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 264,047 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IDA blend?
Denmark, at 8.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 278,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IDA blend?
8.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IDA blend?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IDA blend rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 28th and IDA blend ranks 26th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IDA blend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-blend/">Denmark vs IDA blend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.