Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Côte d'Ivoire
226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
141st
Iceland rank
140th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 2,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 26,383 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,003 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 55,673 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 68,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 79,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 99,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 93,389 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 146,307 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 140,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 177,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 206,680 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Côte d'Ivoire or Iceland?
Iceland, at 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
2,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/iceland/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.