Costa Rica vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
69th
Sweden rank
72nd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sweden
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 57,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 208 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 123,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 391,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 268,190 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 226,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 533,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 307,763 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 303,450 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 648,152 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 344,701 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 467,486 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 763,119 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 295,633 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 729,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 276,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 120,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Sweden?
Costa Rica, at 1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Sweden?
57,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sweden rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sweden/">Costa Rica vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.