Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
543.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 543.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 542.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 363.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 45 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 709,159 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 151.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 150.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 891,386 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 255.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 254.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 426.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 425.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 1.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 515.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 514.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Singapore?
Singapore, at 543.77 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
542.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.