Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
62,732 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
59,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
179th
Zimbabwe rank
180th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 62,732 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 180th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,697 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 6,599 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,470 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 9,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,726 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 14,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,434 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 24,606 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,742 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,137 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 43,239 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,351 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 59,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,958 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 62,732 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
2,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 180th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.