Brazil vs Côte d'Ivoire: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
234,631 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire
226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
138th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
141st

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Côte d'Ivoire
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 234,631 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 7,713 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 138th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 141st of 208 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Côte d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 29,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,383 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,895 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 64,177 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,673 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 99,977 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 68,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,487 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 123,337 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79,892 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,445 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 163,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 93,389 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 214,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 140,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 223,271 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 206,680 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,592 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Côte d'Ivoire?
Brazil, at 234,631 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 226,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire?
7,713 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 138th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 141st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Côte d'Ivoire: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/cote-d-ivoire/">Brazil vs Côte d'Ivoire: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.