Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
403,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
465,579 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
114th
North Macedonia rank
111th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • North Macedonia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199220072023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 465,579 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 403,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 61,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and North Macedonia ranks 111th of 208 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 112,395 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 236,190 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 123,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 254,037 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 291,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,326 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 321,543 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 392,558 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 71,015 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 383,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 446,018 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 465,579 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 403,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
61,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and North Macedonia ranks 111th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/north-macedonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs North Macedonia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.