Bangladesh vs Portugal: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
2.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
55th
Portugal rank
52nd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Portugal
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 101,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 55th and Portugal ranks 52nd of 208 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 211,169 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 537,688 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 326,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 237,486 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 925,124 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 687,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 331,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 936,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 499,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.76 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.26 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 819,664 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.39 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 747,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 2.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 148,440 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Portugal?
Portugal, at 2.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Portugal?
101,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Portugal rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 55th and Portugal ranks 52nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Portugal: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/">Bangladesh vs Portugal: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.