Bahamas vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bahamas
1.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
75th
Sweden rank
72nd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Sweden
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 78,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Bahamas ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 365,017 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 391,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 457,455 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 533,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 718,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 648,152 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 864,666 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 763,119 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 101,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 1.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,484 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 189,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Sweden?
78,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Sweden rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/sweden/">Bahamas vs Sweden: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.