Australia vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Australia
214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Iceland rank
140th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 14,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 143rd and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 33,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,003 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 206.68 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 50,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 67,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 92,245 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 99,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,610 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 131,829 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 146,307 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 174,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 177,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,256 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 203,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,047 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Iceland?
14,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.