Australia vs Gambia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Australia
214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
196,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Gambia rank
146th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Gambia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 196,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 18,329 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 143rd and Gambia ranks 146th of 208 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 37,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,416 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,964 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 50,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,177 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 67,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,234 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 92,245 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 77,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 131,829 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 107,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,924 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 174,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 139,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,545 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 203,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 180,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Gambia?
Australia, at 214,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 196,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Gambia?
18,329 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Gambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Australia and Gambia rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Gambia ranks 146th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Gambia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/">Australia vs Gambia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.