Argentina vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
216,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
142nd
Iceland rank
140th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 216,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 13,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 142nd and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 64,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,003 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,487 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 91,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,878 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 103,245 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 127,581 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 99,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,726 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 158,266 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 146,307 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,959 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 212,733 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 177,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 208,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,612 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Iceland?
Iceland, at 229,309 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 216,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Iceland?
13,104 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Iceland rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 142nd and Iceland ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/iceland/">Argentina vs Iceland: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.