Tonga vs Uruguay: Fruit consumption per capita
Tonga
97.12 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uruguay
98.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tonga rank
71st
Uruguay rank
68th
Fruit consumption per capita over time
- Tonga
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 98.56 kilograms per year per capita against 97.12 kilograms per year per capita in Tonga, a difference of 1.44 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Tonga ahead.
Tonga ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 68th of 191 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.28 kilograms per year per capita | 80.1 kilograms per year per capita | 1.18 kilograms per year per capita | Tonga |
| 2020s | 93.04 kilograms per year per capita | 91.25 kilograms per year per capita | 1.79 kilograms per year per capita | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fruit consumption per capita, Tonga or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 98.56 kilograms per year per capita against 97.12 kilograms per year per capita in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fruit consumption per capita between Tonga and Uruguay?
- 1.44 kilograms per year per capita, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Tonga and Uruguay rank globally for fruit consumption per capita?
- Tonga ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 68th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.