Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per

Sao Tome and Principe
3,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
4,167 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
69th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
66th

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
-100.0k0100.0k200.0k197419982023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 4,167 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 413 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 69th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 66th of 188 countries.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 1,488 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 41,968 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 40,480 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 1,231 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 69,753 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 68,522 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per, Sao Tome and Principe or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 4,167 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per between Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
413 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for foreign direct investment, net outflows (bop, current us$), per?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 69th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 66th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-outflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 9,589 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.