Angola vs Guyana: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Angola
-1,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
-5,376 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
183rd
Guyana rank
185th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Angola
  • Guyana
-10.0k010.0k197019962023

How they compare

Angola currently reports -1,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against -5,376 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 3,676 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guyana ahead.

Angola ranks 183rd and Guyana ranks 185th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Guyana Difference Ahead
1970s 2.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 107.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 102.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 460.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 314.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 146.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 977.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 455.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 522.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s -1,547 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,789 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,336 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s -2,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre -725.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,271 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Angola or Guyana?
Angola, at -1,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against -5,376 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Angola and Guyana?
3,676 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guyana?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Guyana rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Angola ranks 183rd and Guyana ranks 185th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Guyana: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/guyana/">Angola vs Guyana: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.