Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Foreign direct investment, net
Foreign direct investment, net over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -465.43 million BoP, current US$ against -559.78 million BoP, current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 94.34 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Rwanda ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 196 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -239.68 million BoP, current US$ | -339.52 million BoP, current US$ | 99.84 million BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | -339.21 million BoP, current US$ | -359.07 million BoP, current US$ | 19.86 million BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign direct investment, net, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -465.43 million BoP, current US$ against -559.78 million BoP, current US$ in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 94.34 million BoP, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for foreign direct investment, net?
- Rwanda ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Foreign direct investment is a category of cross-border investment associated with a resident in one economy having control or a significant degree of influence on the management of an enterprise that is resident in another economy. Ownership of 10 percent or more of the voting power is evidence of a direct investment relationship. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.