Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
43.33 million constant LCU
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
33.73 million constant LCU
in 2016
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
31st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
33rd

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197720012025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 43.33 million constant LCU against 33.73 million constant LCU in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 9.60 million constant LCU.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 46 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 25.60 million constant LCU 62.06 million constant LCU 36.46 million constant LCU Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 32.67 million constant LCU 39.93 million constant LCU 7.26 million constant LCU Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 43.33 million constant LCU against 33.73 million constant LCU in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
9.60 million constant LCU, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.