Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
35.06 million constant LCU
in 2021
Saint Kitts and Nevis
43.33 million constant LCU
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
32nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
31st

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197720012025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 43.33 million constant LCU against 35.06 million constant LCU in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 8.27 million constant LCU.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 32nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st of 46 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 35.43 million constant LCU 35.09 million constant LCU 339,150 constant LCU Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 33.26 million constant LCU 34.59 million constant LCU 1.33 million constant LCU Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Sint Maarten (Dutch part) or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 43.33 million constant LCU against 35.06 million constant LCU in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
8.27 million constant LCU, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Sint Maarten (Dutch part) and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 32nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sint-maarten-dutch-part/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sint-maarten-dutch-part/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Sint Maarten (Dutch part) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.