Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Sao Tome and Principe
66.21 million constant LCU
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
33.73 million constant LCU
in 2016
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
33rd

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M200720162025

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 66.21 million constant LCU against 33.73 million constant LCU in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 32.48 million constant LCU.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.0 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 46 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 66.94 million constant LCU 62.04 million constant LCU 4.90 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 214.67 million constant LCU 39.93 million constant LCU 174.74 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Sao Tome and Principe or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 66.21 million constant LCU against 33.73 million constant LCU in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands?
32.48 million constant LCU, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2016.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.