Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Sao Tome and Principe
66.21 million constant LCU
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
43.33 million constant LCU
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
31st

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197720012025

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 66.21 million constant LCU against 43.33 million constant LCU in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 22.88 million constant LCU.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.5 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st of 46 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 66.94 million constant LCU 25.15 million constant LCU 41.79 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 268.50 million constant LCU 33.05 million constant LCU 235.45 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 107.10 million constant LCU 39.22 million constant LCU 67.88 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Sao Tome and Principe or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 66.21 million constant LCU against 43.33 million constant LCU in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
22.88 million constant LCU, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 31st of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.