Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Sao Tome and Principe
66.21 million constant LCU
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
35.06 million constant LCU
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
32nd

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M200820162025

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 66.21 million constant LCU against 35.06 million constant LCU in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 31.15 million constant LCU.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.9 times Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 32nd of 46 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 339.39 million constant LCU 35.43 million constant LCU 303.96 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 142.46 million constant LCU 33.26 million constant LCU 109.20 million constant LCU Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Sao Tome and Principe or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 66.21 million constant LCU against 35.06 million constant LCU in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
31.15 million constant LCU, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 32nd of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.