Libya vs Namibia: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Libya
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1.12 billion constant LCU against 369.60 million constant LCU in Libya, a difference of 749.05 million constant LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 3.0 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Namibia ahead.
Libya ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 21st of 45 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 983.95 million constant LCU | 902.52 million constant LCU | 81.43 million constant LCU | Libya |
| 2010s | 698.80 million constant LCU | 1.06 billion constant LCU | 366.18 million constant LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Libya or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 1.12 billion constant LCU against 369.60 million constant LCU in Libya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Libya and Namibia?
- 749.05 million constant LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Libya ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 21st of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.