Kiribati vs Palau: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Kiribati
- Palau
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 13.68 million constant LCU against 3.71 million constant LCU in Palau, a difference of 9.98 million constant LCU.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.7 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palau ahead.
Kiribati ranks 36th and Palau ranks 39th of 46 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.11 million constant LCU | 5.53 million constant LCU | 426,760 constant LCU | Palau |
| 2010s | 6.97 million constant LCU | 4.08 million constant LCU | 2.88 million constant LCU | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 8.51 million constant LCU | 4.09 million constant LCU | 4.42 million constant LCU | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Kiribati or Palau?
- Kiribati, at 13.68 million constant LCU against 3.71 million constant LCU in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Kiribati and Palau?
- 9.98 million constant LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Palau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Palau rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Kiribati ranks 36th and Palau ranks 39th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.