Kiribati vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Kiribati
13.68 million constant LCU
in 2024
Micronesia, Federated States of
4.29 million constant LCU
in 2025
Kiribati rank
36th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
38th

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Kiribati
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M197920022025

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 13.68 million constant LCU against 4.29 million constant LCU in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 9.39 million constant LCU.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.2 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.

Kiribati ranks 36th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 38th of 46 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Micronesia, Federated States of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
1990s 1.99 million constant LCU 2.26 million constant LCU 271,720 constant LCU Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 5.11 million constant LCU 3.35 million constant LCU 1.76 million constant LCU Kiribati
2010s 6.97 million constant LCU 3.59 million constant LCU 3.38 million constant LCU Kiribati
2020s 8.51 million constant LCU 4.39 million constant LCU 4.11 million constant LCU Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Kiribati or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Kiribati, at 13.68 million constant LCU against 4.29 million constant LCU in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2024.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Kiribati and Micronesia, Federated States of?
9.39 million constant LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Micronesia, Federated States of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Kiribati ranks 36th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 38th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/kiribati/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/kiribati/micronesia-fed-sts/">Kiribati vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.