Kazakhstan vs Kenya: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 325.97 billion constant LCU against 258.94 billion constant LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 67.03 billion constant LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Kenya ranks 4th of 46 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 370.50 billion constant LCU | 118.02 billion constant LCU | 252.47 billion constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 258.94 billion constant LCU | 151.81 billion constant LCU | 107.13 billion constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Kazakhstan or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 325.97 billion constant LCU against 258.94 billion constant LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 67.03 billion constant LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kenya rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Kenya ranks 4th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.