Jamaica vs Vanuatu: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Jamaica
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 29.37 billion constant LCU against 5.70 billion constant LCU in Vanuatu, a difference of 23.68 billion constant LCU.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 5.2 times Vanuatu's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 18th of 46 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.58 billion constant LCU | 3.60 billion constant LCU | 31.98 billion constant LCU | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 30.27 billion constant LCU | 4.94 billion constant LCU | 25.33 billion constant LCU | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Jamaica or Vanuatu?
- Jamaica, at 29.37 billion constant LCU against 5.70 billion constant LCU in Vanuatu as of 2014.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Jamaica and Vanuatu?
- 23.68 billion constant LCU, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Vanuatu?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and Vanuatu rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Jamaica ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 18th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.