Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Congo
110.79 billion constant LCU
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea
63.54 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Congo rank
9th
Equatorial Guinea rank
11th

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
25.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B200520152025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 110.79 billion constant LCU against 63.54 billion constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 47.25 billion constant LCU.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 9th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th of 46 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 26.05 billion constant LCU 38.96 billion constant LCU 12.90 billion constant LCU Equatorial Guinea
2010s 63.79 billion constant LCU 72.12 billion constant LCU 8.33 billion constant LCU Equatorial Guinea
2020s 110.79 billion constant LCU 57.46 billion constant LCU 53.33 billion constant LCU Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 110.79 billion constant LCU against 63.54 billion constant LCU in Equatorial Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
47.25 billion constant LCU, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Congo ranks 9th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-constant-lcu/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
47 places, 1,035 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.